First off, a bit of news to digest (if you can).

Before I spill any bile on his vision, let me just say I like John Boorman a heck of a lot. Best known for “Deliverance” - which I don’t think I’ll ever be able to bring myself to watch again - and “Excalibur,” I’d have to say I prefer to those “Hope and Glory” and, most of all, “The General.” whether you haven’t seen that flick starring Brendan Gleeson as Irish robber Martin Cahill, I really can’t recommend it highly sufficient.

Now, however, it seems that Mr. Boorman is more than a little deep into a CGI-animated adaptation of “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.” I’ll let that sink for a second before I have anything at all to say about it.

I’ve included a shot of the concept art of Dorothy, courtesy of AICN (where you can see a heck of a lot more.) I had hoped until a few years ago that, even with all evidence to the contrary, there still were at least a few classic movies that were truly untouchable. foolish me.

Boorman, in fact, is far from the first person in recent memory to take on that magical saga, but it just might be the first one I’ll give a chance to. whether I have my info right, Todd McFarlane had been toying with a really sadistic take on the tale (no thanks!), and there was “Tin Man” on Sci Fi, which couldn’t hook me even with the presence of Zooey Deschanel and Alan Cumming.

So, why give John Boorman a chance? Well, I’ve never read L. Frank Baum’s original book (a rather serious shortcoming on my part), but from what Variety had to say about that Boorman is sticking closer to that work and will come up with quite a different tale from the original movie (can you imagine, for example, that the Tin Man was a munchkin? Wild.)

Besides, I have to confess that I had the satisfaction of seeing “The Wiz” in New York when I was a kid, so I guess there really isn’t

anything that’s all that sacred (but please keep your hands off of “To Kill a Mockingbird”!)

A late comer to the party with “Chuck”

I watch far too much TV already, so I’m always hesitant to commit to any new series just to have them snatched away just as I was getting into the game. It seems that “Pushing Daisies” may be gone after its 13-episode run ordered so far, and while I won’t be terribly surprised, I will miss it dearly.

And it’s that fear of TV commitment that kept me from ever tuning into NBC’s “Chuck” despite mounting evidence that it was really, really good. Now, with two of my co-workers - Stephanie Hartley and Karen Ludwig - practically begging me to watch it, I’ve finally given in (and, to be as crude as possible, it has been a rather towering while since a woman begged me to do anything, so how could I resist?)

Since everyone already has spies on their minds with Daniel Craig back as James Bond in “Quantum of Solace” (and I will indeed be checking that out that weekend, despite some really poor early reviews), I thought I’d offer a very late plug for “Chuck,” which is much funnier and just plain fun than I ever would have imagined.

I’ll be catching up on it that weekend thanks to Netflix, but whether you think you can just picture a contemporary “Get Smart” starring slackers and a seriously hot Yvonne Strahovski as reluctant spy Chuck’s (Zachary Levi) handler (no need to be crude there, people), you should tune in too (though most everyone who would like that is probably well into it already.)

And, though I promised the makers of the sensational documentary “In a Dream” that I would review it soon (and I will!), I’ll just wrap that up with the latest TV spot for David Fincher’s upcoming “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” (because I really do have to get to what is still my paying job.) Enjoy, and have a perfectly pleasant Thursday.

Original post by Reel Fanatic