Now I didn’t bother to see “Norbit,” a k a Eddie Murphy’s ultra-classy career move directly after getting his first acting Oscar nomination, but believe it or not - whether you look deep ample - you’ll indeed find it buried in Tuesday’s Oscar nominations.

Facing off with the folks behind the maquillage in “La Vie en Rose” and “Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End” in the Achievement in Makeup category, Rick Baker and Kazuhiro Tsuji have a solid chance of walking away with one of those little statues primarily for, well, putting Eddie Murphy in a fat suit. Sheesh.

In much better news about a much more worthy nominee, cinematographer Roger Deakins has pulled off an impressive double dip that we haven’t seen since 1971.

The cinematographer’s nominations for “No Country for Old Men” and “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford” are the first double in the category since Robert Surtees was nominated for “The Last Picture Show” and “Summer of ‘42.”

Nominated five times previous to that year, Deakins is best known as the primary cinematographer for the Coens, having filmed nine of their movies thus far (and how in the world did he not win an Oscar for the wild look of “O Brother Where Art Thou?”), but among his other various credits you’ll additionally find great flicks like John Sayles’ “Passion Fish,” Frank Darabont’s “Shawshank Redemption” and Martin Scorsese’s “Kundun.”

This year, his competition comes from (besides himself): Seamus McGarvey for “Atonement,” Janusz Kaminski for “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly” and Robert Elswit for “There Will Be Blood.”

Of those, I haven’t seen “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly” or “The Assassination of Jesse James By the Coward Robert Ford,” and “There Will Be Blood” certainly had a singular look to it, but no movie left a stronger or longer-lasting visual impression on me in 2007 than “No Country for Old Men,” so here’s hoping that artist finally gets the recognition he

clearly deserves.

New hope for an end to the strike?

“Ironic” is a term I’ve tried to stop using too often considering I’m fairly convinced I use it incorrectly, but it would certainly seem to fit the latest development in the WGA strike.

As the scribes have stood strong in the picket line, the leeches who produce reality TV have jumped into the void with zeal, filling my TV set with simply unwatchable crap. Now, in what can only be called fair play in my book, it seems that in casual talks Tuesday that will hopefully lead to solid negotiations, the writers have dropped a demand to unionize the folks who create reality fare (the fine folks in the animated division apparently got cut loose too, unfortunately.)

And in another hopefully promising development, both sides have agreed to a “news blackout” until some deal can be reached. Now, public, can’t we all just get along?

Why is that advertised at my multiplex?

For at least three months now there has been a poster at one of my local multiplexes, the AmStar 16 (or The Grand, or whatever it’s called now), for “The Hunting Party,” a flick which I’ve wanted to see for a enlarged date.

So, imagine my surprise when, surveying that week’s DVD releases, I found the Richard Shepard flick starring Terrence Howard, Richard Gere and Jesse Eisenberg (of “The Squid and the Whale.”) In the serio-comedy, the trio embarks on an unauthorized mission to find the No. 1 war criminal in Bosnia and gets mistaken for a CIA hit squad.

Now, I’m very happy I’ll finally get to see that flick, which has just been moved to the top of my (fully stocked, thanks to the readers of that site) Netflix queue, but is it too much to ask that the poster promising its mythic big-screen appearance in Macon be taken down? Peace out.

Original post by Reel Fanatic