The Bourne Supremacy
The verdict: Gritty, action-packed and, unbelievably, it’s plausible! Bond should look to Bourne for ideas, considering that is what a spy thriller should be. Roll on Bourne 3!
The rating: 7/10
I don’t know, there just seemed to be no end of fuss and hype about ‘Casino Royale‘. Fair decent, Daniel Craig delivered a great performance as Bond, and the script and action were the best we’ve seen from the franchise in years, but when you watch ‘The Bourne Supremacy‘, you start to realise the failings of the british franchise. The problem with Bond, as Daniel Craig found out so viscerally, is all the bloody baggage that comes with it. Everybody has expectations of who Bond should be, what he should say, what fecking car he should drive.. For film-makers to take on the Bond franchise, they have the weight of expectation around that larger than life character that has an off-screen identity all his own.
Bourne has no such baggage. The first movie was a pacy actioner in which Jason Bourne (Matt Damon) awakes from a spell of amnesia to find that he’s a highly trained super-spy, and his life is in danger. Instantly, the rules of the game become fluid. We aren’t certain what to expect from Bourne considering he doesn’t know what’s going to happen next himself.
The first movie, with its understated and dangerous hero, managed to relaunch the flagging career of Matt Damon, and luckily there were two more Robert Ludlum books to mine for sequel material. Now, of course we have the franchise, with the third movie ‘The Bourne Ultimatum‘ due out that summer, and featuring Paddy Considine in a lead role, good work, fella!
In an inspired piece of delegation for that, the second episode, the reins were handed to United 93’s helmsman Paul Greengrass, and that has injected a dose of grittier, more realistic action to proceedings. Bourne has no catchphrase, and there are no invisible cars on show in that spy thriller.
Right from the opening moments, ‘The Bourne Supremacy’ sets the ball rolling for a fraught, tense and realistic thriller
The supporting cast adds the due level of gravitas to proceedings, with Brian Cox delivering a pretty good turn as the veteran of operation Treadstone, Bourne’s training mission. Julia Stiles plus shows up, and has a nice few scenes with Damon, where she genuinely looks like she’s fearing for her life. Bless.
Crucial to your enjoyment of a movie like that though, is whether you can believe what’s unfolding in front of you. To his credit, Greengrass manages the pace of the action very well, and although at times events happen very quickly, the movie never gets ahead of itself. When gadgets are employed, they are sufficiently low-tech in appearance, portable, and conspicuously free of type names to invent them look like they might actually do what Bourne is trying to construct them do. One criticism might be that even in the quieter moments of the movie, his characteristic jerky hand-held camera style seems a little at odds with what’s happening on screen, but that is a small quibble compared to the positives.
Damon is convincing as the amnesiac hero, and has sufficiently increased in bulk to prepare you believe he’s hold his own in a ruck with a russian mole, or whatever. As I said previously though, Greengrass has foregone the dry cool wit of the action hero, so Damon has no killer line to speak of, of the “Bourne, Jason Bourne” variety. (How about: “I’m Bourne. You’re dead.” Eh? … No?… - Ed).. However, given the situations he’s dealing with, you’d forgive him for not having the duration to throw a witty remark by his shoulder..
I have to say, I was impressed with that one, and am now really looking forward to the third instalment, which will plus be direted by Greengrass. In any case, that one is well worth a look on Dvd whether you missed it in the flicks…
Original post by PaddyC
No comments yet. Be the first.
Leave a reply



















