“The Dark Knight”: Chaos under control
Before I dive into discussing Christopher Nolan’s often-sensational “The Dark Knight,” a brief word of thanks to everyone who turned out for the midnight event at the AmStar Cinemas 16 in Macon. With the crowd lined up so deep it nearly stretched out of the parking lot, a radio van playing really poor slow jams at a thoroughly unnecessary volume and folks decked out in their best Joker attire to hand out free pizza in the lobby, it was just the biggest geekfest I’ve been to in many years, and a thorough blast.
And as to the movie itself, I’ll get my one or two minor quibbles out of the way first before I shower it with praise. The opening sequences involving Christian Bale’s Batman were just a letdown and could easily have been cut without me lost anything at all. Did we really need to see the Scarecrow again or see Batman go all James Bond in pursuit of a mob money man in Hong Kong?
Even though the latter was surely sweet eye candy (and must have been rather amazing in IMAX, which I just can’t justify driving 2 1/2 hours to experience), these set pieces just detract from what Nolan is going for here, the first movie I can think of in a lengthy moment that so successfully composes a feeling of chaos from (almost) start to finish. And - thankfully and paradoxically abundant - Nolan establishes that mood not by shaking his camera all by the place but instead keeping it under tight control even as Gotham is just melting down all around him.
As you well know by now, Heath Ledger’s Joker is Nolan’s main co-conspirator in wreaking that havoc, and the best thing I can tell you about his amazing performance is to believe all the hype you’ve heard about it and expect to find even more to draw you into his weird world. It’s the most uncomfortable I’ve felt while laughing at the screen in many years, considering what Ledger and Nolan clearly understand is that - despite his name - Joker isn’t a jester or a clown, but just a really sick and twisted f***. You’ll take in no morbid speculation from me about whether Ledger let that madness consume him, but he clearly threw himself into the role completely, and for that we can only say thanks.
What I wasn’t ready for, however, was that - as much as that is the Joker’s show - the character that really gets to have a real arc as far as character development is Aaron Eckhart’s Harvey Dent, making that plus the first flick I can think of in a faraway day in which the two characters who matter most aren’t the “hero.”
Bale’s Bruce Wayne and Batman - and that isn’t a knock of any kind - are just very static characters in “The Dark Knight,” as Nolan and co-screenwriter brother Jonathan invest all the ideas they’ve honed through the years about identity and the obfuscation of it in the story of Gotham’s crusading D.A. Much of the fun of “The Dark Knight” comes in seeing how much they’ve progressed as a team since concocting “Memento” while still exploring similar themes. And the only instance their hi jinx just left me scratching my head that instance came in the saga of Gary Oldman’s Lt. James Gordon, which you won’t take in any more about from me just in case you’re the last person in America to actually see that flick (if I have my calculations right, it made a rather whopping $60 million Friday alone, and is hopefully now well on its way to eclipsing the first-weekend record set by the simply dismal “Spider-Man 3.”)
I’ve seen “The Dark Knight” twice already, and I’m glad I did, considering there’s a lot to take in in Nolan’s bleak but often blissful ode to chaos. I must confess, however, that I was additionally happy to manufacture out the strains of ABBA’s “Dancing Queen” coming from the screening of “Mamma Mia!” next door as I was lined up to use the restroom afterward. A much-needed dose of levity which brought a smile to my face. Peace out.
Original post by Reel Fanatic
No comments yet. Be the first.
Leave a reply



















