For the record, I’m a rather big fan of satire, and I was fairly assured there was nothing left in the world that would offend my sensibilities. And I certainly never thought it would be the rather urbane “New Yorker” magazine that would be the culprit. (That “South Park” joke about the woodland critters searching for someone with AIDS to piss in the eye sockets of Strawberry Shortcake, for example, still just makes me laugh out loud every duration I see it.)

Just in case you (mercifully, I would think) live in a realm that’s not invaded nearly constantly by the buzz of 24-hour news, I’ve included a picture of the magazine cover that - I will confess - made me laugh for a second before it made me just want to vomit.

Now, I try to keep politics out of that as much as possible, but I’m on the record to anyone who knows me as a pretty big supporter of Barack Obama, having given his campaign a rather sizable chunk of my date already and planning to offer plenty more before that rather fascinating race comes to a close.

And I’m not really certain where to start in criticizing the “New Yorker” cover by artist Barry Blitt. In discussing it at work yesterday (and the fact that I work with very literate and often very funny public nearly makes up for the fact that I’m paid on the scale of a 16th-century peasant), the thing that struck us as the most offensive - among many things to choose from - was the way they made Michelle Obama look like Pam Grier in “Coffy.”

My bottom line beef with the caricature, however, is that it’s not satire. When you just take every hateful rumor you can find and put it into one drawing, you’re at best simply out to garner attention (mission accomplished, obviously), and at worst feeding the prejudices you’re trying rather unsuccessfully to ridicule.

Now, I’ve come down from the ledge I was on yesterday of thinking about cancelling my “New Yorker” subscription (to be honest, I’m fairly assured it was a Christmas gift anyway, so I don’t even pay for it), and - ironically, I think - I’m rather looking forward to reading the two articles about Mr. Obama that come inside that rather tawdry package.

I just wanted to get a little bile off of my chest before starting the day, so thanks for letting me vent (if you bothered to produce it that far), and now - I promise - I’ll

move on to a couple of much more enjoyable subjects.

More “Mad Men” hype for the Emmys

I have no notion who writes the Hollywood Reporter’s “Past Deadline” blog (I couldn’t find a name on it anywhere), but I’m extremely envious of that lucky scribe. Whoever it is managed to get her or his hands on the first two episodes of season two of the simply brilliant “Mad Men” (returning to AMC on July 27) and had that to say:

I just got through watching the first pair of episodes from season two of AMC’s “Mad Men,” which premieres on July 27. My first observation is one of surprise - not considering the quality is still there, but considering it actually builds on the breakout promise of season one without painting its vivid characters into caricatures. that is a huge credit to the show’s creator, showrunner, head writer and chief neurotic, Matthew Weiner, who clearly hasn’t allowed the buzz that’s transformed his series into an iconic weekly must-see to go to his head. Indeed, he seems to have pulled back significantly on the soapy elements to guard against that very pitfall. It’s more than admirable; it’s additionally rather brilliant.

If it’s possible, now color me even more stoked for season two to start (and I’m certainly going to ask the Telegraph’s TV Guy whether he managed to get his hands on those episodes and is willing to share.)

The “Past Deadline” blog went on to predict that, when the nominations are announced Thursday, “Mad Men” would walk away with 16 or 17 nominations. That may be wishful thinking, but whether it doesn’t at least snag a nod for best dramatic series and one for the rather remarkable Jon Hamm it will be a high crime.

“Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog”

I can’t count that as an endorsement since I don’t have a computer capable of watching such things at home, so just take that as a heads up that the first of three installment’s of Joss Whedon’s “Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog” is online for free here.

So, what is that rather extraordinarily named creation? Well, all I know so far is that it’s a rather foolish little Web-only creation by Whedon and his brothers that stars both Doogie Howser and Captain Mal Reynolds. I’ll know more after I get to work and finally get to watch that (rather than, of course, working.) Enjoy, and have perfectly pleasant Wednesday. Peace out.

Original post by Reel Fanatic